Category Archives: Sustainable Energy

Devil’s Bargain

Plans to export US natural gas stirs little  debate

U.S. producers are poised to ship vast quantities of gas overseas as energy companies seek permits for proposed export projects that could set off a renewed frenzy of fracking.

Expanded drilling is unlocking enormous reserves of crude oil and natural gas, offering the potential of moving the country closer to its decades-long quest for energy independence. Yet as the industry looks to profit from foreign markets, there is the specter of higher prices at home and increased manufacturing costs for products from plastics to fertilizers.

Companies such as Exxon Mobil and Sempra Energy are seeking federal permits for more than 20 export projects that could handle as much as 29 billion cubic feet of natural gas a day.”

The billions of dollars invested by foreign corporations into fracking operations within the United States in January of 2012 ought to have made every citizen in the United States sit up and take notice.  It didn’t.  China’s purchase of Canada’s largest petroleum company in 2012 and the dramatic push for the ongoing development of oil found in tar sands

I cannot believe the way that the American public is swallowing the lies, deceit, and double-speak spewed by the media and our incontrovertibly corrupt elected representatives who are little more than sock puppets for foreign interests.

The Energy Policy Act of 2005 signed by then President George Bush exempted hydraulic fracturing operations from the Safe Drinking Water Act, freed drilling companies from the obligation to disclose the chemicals injected into deep shale formations to shatter shale and convey gas back to the well.  Below is a screen capture of the actual document:

SEC. 322. HYDRAULIC FRACTURING.      Paragraph (1) of section 1421(d) of the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300h(d)) is amended to read as follows:          `(1) UNDERGROUND INJECTION- The term `underground injection'--              `(A) means the subsurface emplacement of fluids by well injection; and              `(B) excludes--                  `(i) the underground injection of natural gas for purposes of storage; and                  `(ii) the underground injection of fluids or propping agents (other than diesel fuels) pursuant to hydraulic fracturing operations related to oil, gas, or geothermal production activities.'.
Signed by President George Bush: Energy Policy Act of 2005 • Click the image to read the entire document.

The good news for Chinese, French, and multi-national  corporations whose oil extraction efforts utilize fracking is that the EPA has a way for them to circumnavigate the use of diesel fuel in fracking operations:  “Any service company that performs hydraulic fracturing using diesel fuel must receive prior authorization through the applicable UIC program.” – EPA.gov   Which means it is now permissible  to inject diesel fuel into groundwater – as long as the paperwork is filled out before hand.

If a terrorist plot to inject industrial waste into federal park lands, ranches, farms, and watersheds had been discovered one would think that the FBI would be on this in a heartbeat.   It may be that  this is already going on with very little attention (they were released!!) being given to possible terrorists.

What the hell is wrong with our elected officials who are supposed to be acting in the best, long-term interests of our country?  Has approbation been purchased like the companionship of an anonymous partner?   Better yet: why aren’t citizens who are invested in the welfare of this great land picking up the telephone and calling for enforcement of common sense actions?

America’s political activism has flat-lined to coma levels of inactivity. Media-dulled senses, the desire for comfort at any cost, and the effortless embrace of apolitical correctness, has created a nation of perfect patsies.

 

$3.5 – $24 Billion Fusion Projects
vs. Table Top Cold Fusion

The National Ignition Project(NIF) began construction in 1997 under the Clinton Administration.  It was (and still is) an attempt to duplicate the fusion process by which our sun produces energy.   The accepted, current, traditional approach requires the creation, containment, and manipulation of plasma (fourth state of matter) at temperatures between 100 million (NIF) and 150 million (TOKAMAK) degrees Centigrade (90,000,032 F and 270,000,032 F) and pressures 100 billion times that of earth’s atmosphere.

Creating and controlling these conditions has required a substantial amount of new technology to be invented, developed and implemented.  Constructing the project also required a substantial, long-term investment in growing and maintaining the physical and intellectual infrastructure.  Constructed at a cost of $3.5 billion dollars, the NIF currently employs a thousand people and has an annual budget of $140,000,000.   With its hardware occupying a building ten-stories high and three football fields long, this is one of the larger science experiments ever undertaken by man.  While the United States has been working on it’s approach to fusion, other nations have invested a combined $20 billion dollars on a different approach to fusion the called the TOKAMAK:

What started as a civilian project with military undertones will be transferred to military control for weapons development.
NatureWhere the TOKAMAK uses a dynamic toroidal suspension of plasma for fusion experiments the National Ignition Facility’s plan is to use successive one shot technique to generate power, not dissimilar from the model of a one-cylinder piston engine (just a lot faster).

As of April 20, 2013 the National Ignition Facility has failed to yield any ash (Helium), hasn’t been turned on past one third power, and has some significant operational problems:

The managers of the National Ignition Facility (NIF), a giant laser fusion lab in California, have admitted to Congress that they don’t understand why the $3.5 billion machine is not working. And they cannot guarantee that it will ever work.
At present, it is too early to assess whether or not ignition can be achieved at the National Ignition Facility,” wrote Thomas P. D’Agostino, administrator of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) in a report requested by Congress that was submitted last week.

$24 billion dollars invested in hot fusion research — without any demonstrable nuclear by-products or yield of energy in excess of system input.  That’s a lot of money invested no matter what the spin-off technologies produced.

Enter/re-enter a different conversation.  In 1985 two electrochemists experienced an event which burnt a hole in their concrete floor and made a general mess of their lab.  Intrigued, they invested $100k of their own money to continue their research into this phenomenon.  What they didn’t know at the time was that this anomaly had been seen before.

In 1927 Swedish scientist J. Tandberg applied for a patent, “to produce helium and useful reaction energy.”  His claim was that he had discovered a method to fuse of Hydrogen into Helium within an electrolytic cell using Palladium electrodes.  His patent was denied as he could not adequately explain the process.  Sixty-two years later (1989) at the University of Utah, Fleischmann and Pons also used Palladium as an electrode in their experiments.

Fleischmann and Pons held a press conference announcing that they had created a process which resulted in heat in excess with respect to the amount of energy that was applied to a closed system at room-temperature and pressure.  They went on to state that the experiment had produced signatures of a nuclear event including the presence of Helium, neutrons, and Tritium.  The press termed their work “cold fusion.”

At the time, Martin Fleischmann was one of the world’s most respected elecrochemists who at one time held the Farady Chair of Chemistry at the University of Southampton where he had been a professor. Stanly Pons earned is Ph.D. in Chemistry under Fleischmann.

What happened afterwards isn’t so dissimilar to what happened to van Leeuwenhoek when he announced the presence of single-celled organisms, or the refusal of the press to publish news of the Wright Brothers heavier than air flight.

What was different was the campaign to discredit their research at the highest levels of government and academia.  Eugene Mallove was originally a science writer at MIT, which published results which seriously damaged the credibility of Fleischmann and Pons research.  After seeing the original data from MIT and that which was published, Mallove resigned from his position at MIT in protest.

Published data

Actual data
Actual data
Both sets of data
Both data sets

Eugene Mallove, controversial and outspoken critic of mainstream opinion, was murdered in 2004.

That which started out being termed cold-fusion is now referenced as a Low Energy Nuclear Reaction, Lattice Enhanced Nuclear Reaction, Muon-catalyzed fusion (μCF), Sono-fusion (fusion through cavitation), and a few other terms, all once considered fringe or junk science have been heavily published and continue to be researched.

Sheep watching wolves

US Senators Re-Introduce MLP Act to Level Playing Field for Renewable Energy
“SAN FRANCISCO — JinkoSolar Holding Co. and First Solar Inc. were among solar companies that
surged after four U.S. senators introduced legislation that would let renewable- energy projects
qualify for a tax-advantaged corporate structure currently used by oil, natural gas and pipeline
projects.”  — Reneweable Energy World (Bloomberg)
What about cutting the tax-advantage structure for the oil industries and putting ALL energy producing
entities on the SAME playing field? Closing the loopholes in environmental regulations
would be a good start.
Fracking 101: Evasion and escape from environmental laws and regulation
NYTSierra ClubEnvironmental Defense FundCatskill Citizens for Safe Energy
Oil is being traded on the international market. Anyone who thinks that cheap oil and gas is going to
selectively benefit Americans, or achieve “energy independence” has drunk deeply from
Philip Howard’s cup of hemlock.
Once the gas and oil wells have been depleted (three to five years?), what will that land be good for?
Will it ever again be fit for farming or grazing?
Fracked fields in North DakotaFracking operation in Wyoming
Waste water from fracking operations has been found to be contaminated with radioactive elements 300 times higher than federal limits for drinking water and exposure.
If we were alerted that terrorists were intent on poisoning our drinking water or farmlands they would justifiably be met with lethal force.
Why are the American people – and their elected representatives – allowing the poisoning of their water and their land?
The deployment and increased development of solar systems on every roof top in America is our current best way to go. At least until LENR or another technology arrives which disrupts the current coal-oil paradigm.
Once a topic of science fiction, fantasy, and failed dreams, near infinite sources of energy may be near:
In the late 1850s, the whaling industry was in a veritable boom in the town of Lahaina on the Hawaiian island of Maui. Business was great and many in the whaling industry believed that increased demand would continue for decades to come. But in 1859 oil was discovered in Titusville, Pennsylvania by Edwin Drake. The rest is history. That was 150 years ago. A small but increasing number of people around the world believe we are on a similar course, except that this time it is the petroleum industry that might be threatened. The article then goes on to provide an overview of the history and current state of LENR, and discuss its very disruptive nature should it emerge as a useful source of energy. The authors do not predict that LENR will definitely replace petroleum’s place as a primary energy source, but are willing to countenance that it is a real possibility. They emphasize that the petroleum industry needs to be prepared to deal with the possible disruptions that could come if LENR pans out to be a viable alternative energy source. They state: If proven to work, what impact would LENR have on the petroleum industry? It is difficult to say for certain, but it would undoubtedly be significant. The vast preponderance of oil is used for transportation and heating which would now be competing with LENR. While there would still be need for petroleum chemicals and other applications, collectively these end uses represent less than about 20% of each barrel. Natural gas would not fare much better; its main applications are heating and electricity. If LENR works the impact on the petroleum industry, power generation and coal industry would be enormous. It’s quite a significant thing in my opinion, for an article like this to be published in a respected publication in the petroleum industry. The Journal of Petroleum Technology is the official magazine of Society of Petroleum Engineers. I would not be surprised if this starts a conversation among professionals in the oil industies, and leads to more attention being paid to the emerging LENR story. To read the article you will need to go to this link, http://www.mydigitalpublication.com/publication/?i=116298and choose ‘Contents’ from the menu at the top. The article begins on page 18.
Editorial in Oil Industry Trade Magazine Focuses on LENR Threat. Click image above. Read the article on page 18.

Something needs to change for the better and change before we are paying more for a drink of water than we are for a gallon of gasoline.

The Privatization of Water: Nestlé Denies that Water is a Fundamental Human Right
The Privatization of Water: Nestlé Denies that Water is a Fundamental Human Right

But this is another chapter in the same story and I will leave this for another series of posts.

Peter Terezakis
ITP Master’s Candidate
Tisch School of the Arts
http://www.terezakis.com